Next: Experimental Setup
Up: Experimental Details
Previous: Crystal Growth Process
  Contents
Figure 3.1 shows the crystal structures of the electron-doped cuprate Pr
Ce
CuO
and the
hole-doped cuprate La
Sr
CuO
. The hole-doped compound has a
-phase structure where the copper atom is
octahedrally coordinated with six oxygen atoms. On the other hand, Pr
Ce
CuO
has a
-phase where there are
no interstitial oxygen atoms.
Fig. 3.1:
Crystal structure of
La
Sr
CuO
and Pr
Ce
CuO
.
|
The results reported in this thesis are mainly from measurements on one of the single crystals, having a thickness of
mm, an
-
plane surface area of
mm
and a mass of
mg. It is the smallest single
crystal measured by
SR using surface muons. Figure 3.2 shows the results of resistivity and bulk
magnetic susceptibility measurements performed on this crystal. The resistivity measurements performed in zero external
magnetic field, indicate that
K. This suggests that the crystal is near optimally doped with
. However, the bulk magnetic susceptibility, measured using a Superconducting Quantum Interference Device
(SQUID), reaches a constant value only below
K. Given that resistivity measurements are sensitive to the ``path
of least resistance'', the magnetic susceptibility is a better indication of the average value of
in the bulk of the
sample.
Fig. 3.2:
Bulk magnetic susceptibility measurements taken under field-cooled (FC) and
zero-field cooled (ZFC) conditions with
=
Oe and resistivity measurements (solid triangles) in zero external
magnetic field. The applied field is directed along the crystallographic
-axis.
|
Fig. 3.3:
Schematic of the experimental setup. All the components are contained within a
He gas-flow cryostat.
|
Next: Experimental Setup
Up: Experimental Details
Previous: Crystal Growth Process
  Contents
Jess H. Brewer
2003-07-01